Our Top KPIs – Chosen by Residents

Resident Engagement

CAHA Resident Voice Logo
We have launched the revised resident involvement logging codes, staff have started using the new approach to record their work with residents. Tenants have engaged in 15 co-design/scrutiny activities in quarter 1 (April — June 2026).

 

Non-emergency repairs completed in target timescale

spanner and screwdriver icon

98% of non-emergency repairs were completed within the target timescale in quarter 1 (April — June 2026). This is above our target of 90% and an improvement from the previous year of 92%.

 

Customer Satisfaction

smiley face with clapping hands

TSM Survey respondents who report that they are satisfied with the overall service is up from 51.6% in 2024-25 to 64.0% in 2025-26.

Complaints within time frame

clipboard saying complaint

86% of the complaints were handled within the time frame for the period April to June 2026 (quarter 1). We are pleased with the improvement and meeting our target that is 85%.

Our Tenant Satisfaction Measures (TSMs) Performance 2025-26

The cover of the 2025-26 TSM reportThe TSMs are a core set of performance measures, which all providers must publish their performance against.

You may learn more on the requirements and see our results in our report for 2025-26 link here to a PDF file —  TSM Performance Report 25-26[pdf] 4MB

Our performance & improvement plans

CAHA Resident Voice LogoWe publish our performance against key measures to show how we are doing and how well we are delivering services for our residents.

Our performance is measured against a range of key performance indicators (KPIs), including areas such as repairs, housing management, customer satisfaction, complaints, rent collection and tenant safety.

We will publish our KPI performance online every quarter. Following consultation with residents, we will also include a six-monthly performance report in our tenant newsletter, providing more detail on our performance against the  top 20 KPIs identified and requested by residents.

The latest results show where we are meeting our targets, where performance has improved, and where further work is needed. We use this information to identify areas for improvement and to make sure we remain focused on delivering safe, reliable and high-quality services for our residents.

For more information about our complaints performance, please see our Annual Complaints Performance Report, available via the link below.

We are committed to reporting our performance openly and transparently, giving residents regular opportunities to see how we are doing and hold us to account.

Our KPIs

Overall KPIs Performance for Quarter 1 (April — June 2026)

🟢  26 on target
🟠  11 slightly below target
🔴  7 below target

The direction is showing the progress from the previous period as follows: ↑ Improving ↔ Stable ↓ Declining

🏠  Repairs and maintenance
KPI
2025-26
Target
Q1 (04-06/26)
Direction
Repairs completed right first time %
80%
80%
80%
Appointments kept %
93%
95%
96%
Percentage of non-emergency repairs completed in target timescale
91%
90%
98%
Average repair completion time (days)
n/a
12
7.4
n/a
Cost per property £'s (routine repairs)
n/a
£1,068
£521
n/a
Planned vs responsive maintenance ratio %
n/a
60%:40%
71%:29%
n/a
No. of responsive repairs per property per month per 1,000 properties
248
300
231
Homes that do not meet the Decent Homes Standard
4%
5%
3%
Stock condition survey coverage %
98%
100%
99%

Repairs & maintenance:  Strong Q1 performance overall, with most targets met or exceeded. Repairs were completed faster, appointments and repair timescales improved, and fewer homes failed to meet the Decent Homes Standard.

😊  Customer satisfaction
KPI
2025-26
Target
Q1 (04-06/26)
Direction
Satisfaction with Repairs
79%
80%
79%
Was the repairs operative polite and helpful? %
n/a
95%
89%
n/a
Did the repairs operative tidy up after themselves %
n/a
95%
85%
n/a
% of emergency responsive repairs completed within target timescale
n/a
90%
100%
n/a
% Responsive repairs outstanding ('work in progress') at month-end 
n/a
n/a
3%
 
% of overall tenant satisfaction with letting process n/a 85% 90% n/a
% of ASB satisfaction with action taken n/a 85% 92% n/a

Customer satisfaction:  Customer satisfaction was mixed but generally positive, with lettings and ASB satisfaction exceeding target. Repairs satisfaction remained slightly below target, with operative helpfulness and tidiness identified as areas for improvement.

📞  Complaints and Customer Services
KPI
2025-26
Target
Q1 (04-06/26)
Direction
% Calls not answered / abandoned 8% 10% 5%
Average time taken to answer call (seconds) 52.8 100 60.33
Complaints responded to within target time % 71% 85% 86%
Total Complaints relative to size of landlord - per 1000 homes 10.1 8.3 9.64
Total ASB cases relative to the size of the landlord - per 1000 homes 17.9 25 3.82

Complaints & customer services:  Strong customer service performance overall, with fewer abandoned calls, quicker response times and complaints handled above target. Complaint volumes remain slightly above target, while ASB cases were well below target.

💷  Housing, Rent & Income
KPI
2025-26
Target
Q1 (04-06/26)
Direction
Current tenant arrears % 4.5% 4.0% 4.5%
Rent collected in year from current tenants % 95% 99% 96%
Former tenant arrears % 4.8% 2.5% 10.3%
%age of Universal Credit (UC) tenants in arrears n/a 10% 35% n/a
%age of HB tenants in arrears n/a n/a 24% n/a
% of tenants in arrears n/a n/a 68% n/a
Void loss % 2.4% 2.0% 1.7%
Average routine void turnaround re-let time (days) 71 48 35

Housing, rent & income:  Performance was mixed, with strong void turnaround times and improved rent collection. However, tenant arrears remain above target, particularly among former tenants and Universal Credit tenants, which is under review by our Income team.

🛡️  Building and tenant safety
KPI
2025-26
Target
Q1 (04-06/26)
Direction
Communal areas with valid Asbestos Survey % 100% 100% 100%
Dwellings with valid Asbestos Survey % 98% 100% 98%
Communal areas with valid EICR (Electric Certificate) % 99% 100% 100%
Dwellings with valid EICR (Electric Certificate) % 100% 100% 99%
Properties with valid FRA (Fire Risk Assessment) % 98% 100% 98%
Communal areas with valid LGSR (Gas Certificate) % 100% 100% 100%
Dwellings with valid LGSR (Gas Certificate) % 100% 100% 99%
Assets with valid LOLER report (Lift Report) % 90% 100% 86%
Assets with valid Legionella Risk Assessment % 100% 100% 100%
% of homes EPC C or above n/a 80% 76% n/a
No. of overdue H&S actions n/a n/a 119 n/a
No. of overdue H&S high risk actions n/a n/a 14 n/a
Damp & Mould cases reported as a %age of stock n/a 13% 6% n/a
New emergency hazard cases reported per 1,000 properties 7.6 25 50
New significant damp and mould hazard cases reported per 1,000 properties

17.5

11 0.5
Percentage of emergency hazards resolved within 24 hours 77% 100% 100%
Percentage of significant damp and mould hazards investigated within 10 working days 100% 100% 100%
Percentage of significant damp and mould repairs initiated within 5 working days 100% 100% 100%

Building & tenant safety: Safety performance was strong overall, with most compliance measures at or close to 100% and key damp, mould and emergency hazard response targets achieved. Lift compliance and overdue health and safety actions are under review with our contractors and the Housing team to gain access.

🤝  Resident engagement (new KPIs)
KPI
Q1 (04-06/26)
Tenants engaged in co-design &/or scrutiny 15
Strategic decisions demonstrably influenced by tenant input 1
Number of service improvements from tenant feedback 1
Trained & upskilled tenants 3
Compliance with required and committed publications within agreed timescales 100%

Resident engagement (new KPIs):  These new measures focus on the outcomes and impact of resident engagement, rather than simply the number of residents participating. In Q1, tenants influenced a strategic decision and contributed to a service improvement, alongside involvement in co-design and scrutiny and opportunities to develop their skills. All required publications were also delivered within agreed timescales.

👥Our People
KPI
2025-26
Target
Q1 (04-06/26)
Direction
Rolling annual Staff turnover % 37.6% 20% 23%
The average number of working days/shifts lost due to sickness 9.3 8 1.1
Staff satisfied with organisation as an employer % (annual measure) 90% 88% n/a n/a

Our people:  Staff sickness levels were significantly below target in Q1, while staff turnover has improved compared with 2025/26 but remains above target. Staff satisfaction remains strong, with the latest annual measure exceeding target.

Table of KPIs for 2024-25